|
|
|
I really feel the need to make an immature joke about the ball...
|
|
|
newfieldgrafix
Guest
|
They're not that expensive, but I don't like the bag either. Dyson motors are he shittiest thing in the world; I've had three.
|
|
|
|
They're not that expensive, but I don't like the bag either. Dyson motors are he shittiest thing in the world; I've had three. @tonystark: Say It. Your vacuum has more balls than you do. Waka waka waka.
Last Edit: Oct 8, 2010 19:12:58 GMT by Josh
|
|
|
newfieldgrafix
Guest
|
Yeah, protip: Don't vac hair... Dyson's DON'T like hair. I go through them quicker than underwear.
|
|
|
|
Yeah, protip: Don't vac hair... Dyson's DON'T like hair. I go through them quicker than underwear. Perhaps a haircut would be cheaper?
|
|
|
|
newfieldgrafix
Guest
|
Yeah, protip: Don't vac hair... Dyson's DON'T like hair. I go through them quicker than underwear. Perhaps a haircut would be cheaper? Hell no. £60 per cut (4 weekly). vs £50 (2-3 times, per annum).
|
|
|
|
Perhaps a haircut would be cheaper? Hell no. £60 per cut (4 weekly). vs £50 (2-3 times, per annum). ...you get 4 hair cuts a week? Please tell me you mean you get one every 4 weeks. And that is ridiculous for a hair cut, dude.
|
|
|
|
I meant "haircut" as in cutting it down to non-vacuum-raping-length.
|
|
|
|
|
When you get a new vacuum you instantly feel the urge to sweep every square inch of the house.
New vacuums are awesome.
|
|
|
newfieldgrafix
Guest
|
Hell no. £60 per cut (4 weekly). vs £50 (2-3 times, per annum). ...you get 4 hair cuts a week? Please tell me you mean you get one every 4 weeks. And that is ridiculous for a hair cut, dude. [every] 4 weekly.
|
|
|