1,000 may be pushing it just a bit. That'd also just encourage a LOT of spamming.

And yes, there obviously will be a requirement.

It should maybe be 50 to 150?

It should be 500 with the option of the forum leaders negating the request based on participation.

What about 250? 500 seems a bit big !

...that's the point. An active member can get 100-200 posts in a week easily. This means that if someone really wants this they will be giving two-three weeks activity minimum.

Ok , I see 500. It could make the community have more active members.

On the flipside, 500 would make it so the service would more or less not be used as far as I can tell. We'll decide upon it as we get much closer to the v3 release.

Exactly. It can be figured out later.

I guess this is not the time!

Pushing it? Please. The emo bitch who doesn't want to get 1000 quality posts can bleed me a river.

I think 250 or 500 POSTS are great because it will build on the community and maybe make them stay.



Last Edit: Jul 25, 2008 15:15:59 GMT by stoner

Metro have you noticed yet that half of your posts are ignored because either they are completely pointless, or you just state the obvious, or you state exactly what the person above you JUST said?

I modified it to your liking Sir Fredy!