|
|
Josh, Adobe programmers are gonna make a hell of a lot more than that.... $19k a year? I see a minimum of $50k. I said, "and that is if they are cheap bastards"  Yes, you can but don't go thinking you'll buy CS2 and then upgrade to CS3 that way. It'll be more expensive. 
|
|
This is my old account. This is my new account
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I already have Cs2 I can easily upgrade it to Cs3  But I'm not gonna pay 200$ rofl
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's new in CS3 that makes it so special compared to CS2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Practically nothing from what i've read.
|
|
|
|
|
Then, why does everyone think it's so great? From Josh has been saying, it's a freaking huge memory hog. (700k or so)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What's new in CS3 that makes it so special compared to CS2? the title of the program
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No... that's CS2. That's one of the major improvements with CS3. I haven't played with it in a while but it's quicker, the pallettes are better organized and are able to be run both the traditional PS style or the old Macromedia style (Which I prefer for the most part), filters are much faster and can be fine tuned even further. Brush pallette was expanded. Lots of new options. That kind of thing.
|
|
This is my old account. This is my new account
|
|
|
|
|
not to mention the "vanishing point" tool  and the ability to discern static pixels from dynamic pixels in a series of shots.
|
|
|
|
|
not to mention the "vanishing point" tool and the ability to discern static pixels from dynamic pixels in a series of shots. I only have about 3 weeks of CS3 under my belt so I haven't gotten the chance to really explored. And I wouldn't use those often to begin with
|
|
This is my old account. This is my new account
|
|
|
|
|
I'll get CS3...soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I guess those are fairly good improvements, but I still see no reason not to use CS2. It works perfectly fine as is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see no reason not to use Photoshop 7.
It works perfectly...fine...as is, too.
What.
|
|
|
|
|
I use CS2 and I really wanna upgrade to CS3... CS2 is way to dang slow when it comes to brushes for me to be happy. :-\ I used to have nearly 200mb of brushes loaded and it took several minutes to load up the brush pallet to the bottom. If I ever got CS3, it would be for the loading times and to have a more up to date version of it... $200 is a lot though.. I could get vista or upgrade from CS2 to CS3... wtf kind of choice is that??? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I see no reason not to use Photoshop 7. It works perfectly...fine...as is, too. What. I said that too til I got CS2 from my cousin. I use CS2 and I really wanna upgrade to CS3... CS2 is way to dang slow when it comes to brushes for me to be happy. :-\ I used to have nearly 200mb of brushes loaded and it took several minutes to load up the brush pallet to the bottom. If I ever got CS3, it would be for the loading times and to have a more up to date version of it... $200 is a lot though.. I could get vista or upgrade from CS2 to CS3... wtf kind of choice is that??? Clearly one meant to crush your soul into a pile of dust and let it blow away into the wind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So, who knows what a torrent is? Not that I use it... Seriously, I only have Microsoft Paint.
Last Edit: Jul 21, 2007 2:32:04 GMT by Jordan
|
|
|
|
