|
|
|
Which one's better in your opinion? A few years ago I played the first Burnout and it sucked big time. Later on I rented Burnout 3 a while ago and it was pretty awesome, but I never bought it 'cause I wanted to rent Revenge and see if it was better. Well I never got around to it, and now I can't find Revenge (to rent) anywhere. So to anyone who's played both, which is better? Or should I get both? I'm pretty sure they're both like $20 now.
I'm not gonna get Dominator or whatever that new one is because that's almost like a scaled-back version of the previous games.
|
|
|
|
|
I own all four of them and plan on getting Burnout 5 when it come out later this year. They are all amazing. I prefer Revenge since it was actually made specifically for the 360 and then ported to the other consoles and it's just more fun. 
|
|
This is my old account. This is my new account
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty sure it was the other way around, but that doesn't matter. I just needs me some good old car crashing. What makes Revenge better than 3? I found it has traffic checking, and it still has the crash mode which 3 had (which for some reason was scrapped in Dominator), so that looks mighty appealing.
|
|
|
|
|
It's just overall better. The gameplay is more steady and you can take a break from the crashing and actually race if you want to, though the crashes are still there. And the signature crashes are pretty cool too. Not to mention that the tracks are designed to be crashed on, something I found the first three lacked quite a bit.
|
|
This is my old account. This is my new account
|
|
|
