|
|
Links
Mar 14, 2009 14:10:15 GMT
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 14, 2009 14:48:03 GMT
I second this. Sounds like a good idea, it shortens links and we still know what it's all about.
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 14, 2009 19:21:12 GMT
But no more Rick Rolling.  I third it though. Gives you an idea of what you're clicking.
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 15, 2009 20:19:43 GMT
It's difficult to do that in all cases though. However, I should be able to do something like that at least for deviantArt links. Also, what's wrong with using the status bar to see what the link is? 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 15, 2009 21:40:23 GMT
I do use the status bar usually, but I guess it's just one of those anoying things having to rollover a link.
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 15, 2009 22:27:29 GMT
You have to rollover it to click the link anyway... and how is it any different then them using a random image that has nothing to do with the link?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 16, 2009 0:11:31 GMT
What random image?
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 16, 2009 0:51:16 GMT
RvS-Collab-C4D-Pack-115735663 = random image
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 16, 2009 12:17:29 GMT
Ok I'm confused (FU Chris, no comments ).. That to me isn't an image...... it's a link.... ... or am I completely blind and it is an image?
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 17, 2009 0:50:32 GMT
I meant like some uses [url=URL][img src="src"][/url] =P You still have to hover to view it anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Links
Mar 17, 2009 2:29:54 GMT
Yeah which, with that it's fine. Though most people put in descriptions what site it's hosted on etc. So you don't need to check.
|
|
|
