For those of you who are very sensitive about the White House, I'm going to say this in a very clean way.

George Bush


Last Edit: Dec 19, 2006 1:09:24 GMT by Scorpian

LOL

my answer... is the same lol

Hilton and bush.. all the way.

Hallelujah and Merry Christmas everyone!

Well this was a short topic <_< lol

Ok, and exactly how does the world function without a U.S. President? You said "do without" not "replace."

Mithras has a point.

I'd go with my neighbor. Know why? 'Cause you don't know him, so not only could you do without him, you wouldn't even notice a difference.

Scorpian said we cud do without GEORGE BUSH - not the US PRESIDENT --- there's a difference. What he said automatically implies that another will fill in and take-over --- another person who is probably better suited for the job.

And further more, the US doesn't need a president. Either way, its still just as chaotic... but maybe with no president, there will be less wars

in a way that may be true fredy. But i like Hilary Clinton - She may prove to be a better President, given the right set of opportunities and circumstances.

Hilary Clinton deserves to be fornicated with a molten rod. She's one of the leading politicians against videogame violence and videogame sex. How dare she?!

*chuckles* Even if she does become president, she'd have quite a hard time against video game violence, considering the amount of gamers we have in the US. Just a thought, can you imagine her becoming president in South Korea? I'd bet she'd be assassinated.

Call me crazy, but I think the world could do without humanity itself. Really, the world would be a much safer place without us running around the planet. *Squats an ant nearby*

So is Stevie Wonder, which is very strange. Why? HE CAN'T SEE THE FRICKIN' GAME!!!